Custom Search

Third journalist gunned down in Honduras in two weeks

3
Average: 3 (3 votes)

As we regularly hear about "press repression" in Nicaragua, this bit of regional news seems to add a bit of perspective. Much like the article about dealing with mining activists in El Salvador, murder is an effective way of eliminating those ongoing complaints.

In any case, I am glad I run NicaLiving and not HondLiving.

Nahúm Palacios, a news director for TV Aguãn (Channel 5), was shot to death Sunday in Tocoa, Colón, a city near the Atlantic coast. A companion riding in the car with him was severely wounded, and a camera operator riding in the back was grazed by a bullet El Heraldo and El Tiempo report.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

And now, 2 more

2 more were just killed (Radio journalists Jose Bayardo & Manuel de Jesus Juarez were gunned down late last week out in Oloncho), so at least 5 in March alone. Though there are various theories, few try to reconcile these acts, which dont benefit any political party, with the fact that the country is bankrupt, there is a major staple foods shortage, there is record unemployment and yet somehow the new CID Gallup poll puts the post-coup President with an rather amazing 75% approval rating.

Honduras Tops Murder List

With an average of 58 violent deaths per 100,000 inhabitants, Honduras has climbed into first place in the murder stats in Central America, up from Guatemala and El Salvador, which were ahead of them in previous years. Violent acts against life in Honduras reached alarming levels, it is estimated that between 2005 and 2009, at least 18,435 people were murdered. 35% of the 2009 murders have been recorded as being carried out by hired killers.

2009 MURDERS PER 100,000 people

Honduras 58

(Honduras Previous 5 years)

2005 2,417

2006 3,018

2007 3,262

2008 4,473

2009 5,265

Remainder of CA for 2009 PER 100,000 people

El Salvador 52

Guatemala 48

Belize 32

Panama 19

Nicaragua 13

Costa Rica 11

World Health Org. (WHO)

20,000+

According to the "Observatorio de la Violencia" (A University think-tank of sorts, funded by the UN and Sweden), the numbers revealed yesterday indicate 20,590 Hondurans, up from the 18,435 number used last year. The newest data isn't yet in final form, but their remarkably thorough, late 2009 report covers the essentials and offers impressive breakdowns on who, where, how - though not so much on "why" (even random violence isn't all that random): IUDPAS 2009 . In the last 48 hours 2 more journalists (including Jose Aleman of Radio America) and an unnamed judge have apparently fled the country.

CONADEH and beyond

According to the new CONADEH Human Rights report (3/31/2010), the latest rate is pegged at nearly 67. On Friday (4/2) "Reporters Without Borders" declared that Honduras has surpassed Mexico and is now the most dangerous country for journalists. The "Committee to Protect Journalists" (4/1) just featured a story onJose Aleman - the latest journalist to flee the country following death threats. Those who have fled have reported repeated death threats or actual attempts on their lives. The theme to them is that if you continue to report the news, you will be die - that simple. Worth noting is that the threats do not target or reference any past reporting and only mention future reporting. None of the reporters killed were working on coup-related stories at the times of their deaths, though some clearly were anti-coup. At the same time, some of the reporters who were attacked or fled were in the employ of pro-coup newspapers. Honduran police are quick to link any murder to organized crime. As the statistic above does, stating that 1/3 are due to contract killings. However, since the police have no leads, no motives, and no suspects, on what basis they conclude 1/3 were contract killings in unclear. Likely related to the attacks on journalists is the fact that nearly 2 dozen Honduran judges have reported death threats in the last 120 days. The Justice of the Natonal Children's Court was assassinated last month, and at least one Justice of the Unified Tribunals Court in Tegus has resigned and fled the country.

"Little Mexico"?

The alleged second wave of murders is blamed on Zelayistas, as revenge for the alleged first wave of political murders, blamed on the Golpistas. The problem with the theory -which is all it is as there isn't any evidence at all that either half is true- is that the first wave obviously didn't benefit Micheletti's supporters and the second wave clearly can't benefit the Resistence. One “group” that benefits from the downward spiral is cartels (and it is far from the first time the tactic has been used by them). The focus on journalists is important because of the statement such a murder makes about information and testimony (criminals, of course, like neither). But, these are not the only significant people being killed. And, the newspaper focus on successful murder attempts blinds the public and especially those outside the country to the number of key people who have fled the country due to death threats and failed murder attempts.

The country was already split though not truly in half as widely reported (the true Resistence is relatively small). These murders help that end though, as they undercut what little confidence there is or was in Honduran government, make democracy look less successful or important and worthy of pursuit, and succeed in making the police suspect everyone yet accomplish nothing - and look incompetent doing even that. The murder progression has been from “fake police” allegedly killing peaceful resistance leaders to unknown teams of heavily armed men murdering pro-coup parties. The first wave places blame on not just the business elite, but on the real police too as the assumption fed to the public via poor journalism and rumor is that they are handling it (they might be; but, to believe this theory one needs to believe that real police in their off-duty hours where uniforms that look like their real ones but aren’t, and drive around in cars that look like their normal ones but aren’t, and go out with weaponry better than that afforded them by their real police job, in groups of 6-10, all to off some unsuspecting and unarmed protester who isn’t a real threat to the administration and never really was). The anti-coup forces have no other way to explain the course of events. The second wave places blame on Zelaya’s hardcore defenders. Though there was little anti-coup violence, this explanation is viable since the coup press hasn’t any other way to explain the events – and it provides a plausible Chavez connection which will never go unused in Honduras.

The coup and international response set up the failure that followed. The coup guaranteed full use of the military, including the air force and navy, through the next planned elections. The dispersement of the military to the borders, coupled with the protests, utilized every police officer in the country. The country’s fairly active and sometimes successful anti-drug setup not only stopped to function, everyone in the country knew it did and those that care outside the country also knew it did. Honduras has more clandestine air strips than any other country between Colombia and Mexico. Honduras hasn't an independent air transport monitoring system and the U.S. -as one of the few, real, meaningful retaliations for the coup- shut down all radar access and assistance. The country was bombarded. At times averaging a couple to several per month planes crashes all with the same cargo: drugs. If in good weather 3 planes crash loaded with cocaine in less than a week, it is as if no political observer asked how many didn’t crash?

Due to the coup and then location of most journalists, newspapers didn't cover many of the incidents or if they did there were no accompanying photographs or detailed stories on what happened. In C.A. news, if there isn’t a photo, preferably a gory one, it is usually a sound bite and not a real article – so often the public was lucky to come across blurbs that police recovered such and such, usually after scavengers made off with most of the real cargo. The Honduran drug czar and many lesser figures were murdered late last year. There was little if any worldwide attention focused on this as what little they seemed willing to afford went toward feigned coup analysis. The coup itself "coincided" with a massive flood of dollars into Honduras, which was covered by many sources. What isn’t widely reported now is that a second smaller flood of dollars is in Honduras. This is occurring in the same region where the most confrontation coup-protest marches were held (some of which was funded), which is the same region where the current Lower Aguan land disputes between campesinos and large landholders is taking place (the campesinos are funded), a region for which real financial dealings take place in Tocoa – which is where journalist Nahúm Palacios was murdered and is the site of investigations by David Meza, the journalist later killed in La Ceiba. Just because the political left and right are the victims doesn’t mean the left and right are necessarily the perpetrators, nor the beneficiaries; it is easy to assume this, as all one needs to do is migrate political arguments to acts of violence making them criminal arguments, but because it is an easy way to interprent events doesn't make it true. While Honduras is a very poor country and is more violent than most neighboring countries, what is happening now isn't simply more of the same old bad or an extension of what happened before, it is different - and the fact that the country is bankcrupt makes it all the easier.

An issue close to my heart...

Hats off to the front line guys, Journalistic Soldiers, going in so we can stay informed.

From the Committee to Protect Journalists web site,

This link gives more on the Honduras issue:

http://cpj.org/2010/03/honduran-radio-reporter-gunned-down.php

And this one gives a good summary (for those learning about Nicaragua) of the relationship between Ortega and the Press here:

http://cpj.org/2010/02/attacks-on-the-press-2009-nicaragua.php

Zelaya death squads

As indicated by the Knight Centre for Journalism, which is the source of information which Fyl references in his thread, the campaign of terrorism against journalists in Honduras is apparently being orchestrated by the faction of former president Manuel Zelaya.

Attacks on journalists in Honduras have evidently increased since the pro-democracy forces in Honduras under the leadership of Roberto Michaletti overthrew the Zelaya dictatorship and ushered in the free and fair elections that resulted in the victory of Porfirio Lobo, who campaigned on a platform of increasing social benefits for the poor.

One of the Knight Centre articles which Fyl quotes in his post focused on the murderous attack by the Zelaya brigades on Karol Cabrera, a TV host on Channel 8, a non-profit broadcaster that functions as a counter-weight to the corporate-owned media in Honduras. Cabrera was an outspoken supporter of the ouster of Zelaya and had reported getting several death threats from the Zelaya faction.

It should comes as no surprise that the Zelaya brigades are using terror to undermine the democratic process in Honduras. Zelaya is a key ally of Hugo Chavez. Currently, the socialist workers party in Spain is demanding that Chavez explain why Venezuela facilitated contacts between narco-traffickers in Colombia and Basque terrorists in order to assassinate foreign statesmen.

I think the implications for Nicaragua are clear. The circle around Ortega are the last remaining government in Central America to give uncritical support to Zelaya and Chavez.

Personally, I would like to see pro-democracy advocates who post on the Ben Linder list use their influence to mount a campaign to pressure Ortega to publicly disassociate himself from the terrorist acts of the Zelaya brigades. The Ben Linder list is the pre-eminent forum in Nicaragua for English-speaking, pro-democracy anti-authoritarians, and as such, I am sure that influential political elites in Managua carefully read every word that is published on it.

Fyl, on behalf of all the civil libertarians and democratic socialists who visit nicaliving, let me thank you for drawing this matter to our attention.

Thanks

That's the best satire I have read in a long time.

FYL, which post was that directed at?

I only ask as sometimes things get posted out of order.

History, especially political black ops has a habit of repeating itself.

The murder of ABC reporter Bill Stewart in Managua (June 1979) was one of the final straws that broke the back of the US support for the Somoza regime. (The murder of Pedro Joaquín Chamorro in January 1978 was a nail in the coffin but he was not an American.)

A month after the Bill Stewart murder, Somoza was gone...

We have all been led to believe that it was a member of the National Guard that murdered him (in broad day light), and his Nicaragau Interpretor at a check stop in Managua.

Yet, Stewart's camera man (in the same vehicle) was allowed to film the murder and somehow get the reel (it was 1978) onto a plane and into Miami for the 6pm news where it was played all over the US on the half hour. It showed Bill Stewart putting his hands up as requested by the 'guard' and then shows him laying face down, in the street hands on his head and then shot twice in the head. And having done that, killed two men on camera, you would let the camera man drive away?

The US needed a reason to finally pull the support to Somoza. What better way than the American people (over supper) watching one of their own getting killed by one of his?

Except was it one of his (Somoza)? or was it one of theirs...as in any set of 3 initials you care to pick.

Q. What has this got to do with Honduras?

A. Same old "Dirty Tricks Dept."

I AM NOT saying that the US is playing games in Honduras, just saying that they have done so before.

The press get "used" all the time, sometimes it's more than a bit of "Duff" information, sometimes they have to die for someones cause.

sorry Juanno but your conclusions are wrong

It's pretty far-fetched to think that was a staged murder in Bill Stewarts case. It also would stretch my imagination to believe the US government under Jimmy Carter would have sanctioned such an exploit. There additionally was an investigation into that murder and one of the the National Guardsmen, a corporal was arrested. He later claimed that it was a private who had shot Stewart and that the same private was killed in combat later that day. Given those facts and the video footage it seems pretty clear that it was just a random murder. No benefit would have accrued to the US government or to the Somoza government in committing such an outrage. And I am sure that the ABC cameraman, Jack Clark and his remaining companions would have high-tailed it out of there as soon as the shooting took place-I know I would have.

Jack Clark , the cameraman who filmed the shooting gave testimony at the inquiry and at no time that I am aware of has he ever retracted his testimony nor indicated that he believed it was other than a random act of violence. Managua was in a state of out and out civil war and there was considerable fighting going on throughout the city. Many more innocents died than Bill Stewart and both the Sandinistas and the Somocistas were committing war crimes in the confused fight that was taking place.

The murder of the Mary Knoll nuns by Salvadorean death squads may have been part of a broader US-backed conspiracy but I for one would not believe Bill Stewart's murder was.

During the Vietnam war I participated in some of the black ops that took place under the Operation Phoenix program. My part was minimal in that we transported the SEAL and Special Force teams that went into the VC strongholds and they carried out their assigned missions of targeted assassinations of suspected VC cadres. Generally speaking, the guys who were "hit" were in fact the bad guys they were supposed to be. The soldiers who carried out those killings and their military intelligence leadership had ample reason to suspect and carry out those assassinations. It is often the case that the CIA and their counterparts in the military intelligence are often maligned as a bunch of cowboy types prone to screwups but my personal experience with these men is that they all highly intelligent and dedicated to their mission to defend their country.

A good case in point is that of Phillip Agee who turned rogue against the CIA and went on to have a successful career as a speaker and writer against the US and CIA policies. I got to know Mr. Agee a bit during my Toronto days and while I did not always agree with his viewpoints, I never doubted his intelligence-he was in fact, a brilliant man. I was a student in the Asian Studies Program at York University at the time and Jerome Chen, who was part of the Canadian negotiating team that orchestrated the "ping-pong diplomacy" reapproachemnt with the US-and China was my professor-it was Jerome who introduced me to Agee. The CIA does not hire dummies and I have never met a single agent that that did not command my respect and that was true whether I liked them or not on a personal level. It is notable that none of the CIA turncoats have ever been targeted for assassination despite due cause while the Russians and Chineses have murdered hundreds if not thousands of rogue agents.

OK, but by the very nature of the topic...

There may not be a black and and white right and wrong. Your comments about the people that chose (or who are chosen) to work in this field may not be aimed at anything I said in my post about Bill Stewart, however; I just want to say that I did not suggest otherwise nor doubt their abilities, let alone try and present them in a bad light.

Fair enough, Juano

my remarks on the CIA were a bit ex tempore to the Bill Stewart case but it seemed to me you were pointing the finger at CIA involvement in alleging the US government may have had a hand in his murder. To the best of my knowledge, the CIA has never targeted journalists nor American citizens in its quest to undo enemies of the US and it's government. Nor was I offering a defense of the CIA per se-I was simply pointing out that the organization is not one that has a lot of dummies in it's ranks. It most certainly has a long involvement in the history of Latin America starting with the case of Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán in Guatemala which is the earliest case I can remember.

More pertinent to affairs in Latin America is the US based School of the Americas which has educated and trained thousands and thousands of Latin American military officers, including many within the ranks of the Honduran military. Latin American dictators by the score have been graduates of this American academy which is a combat training school for Latin American soldiers. As noted at the following link http://www.soaw.org/type.php?type=8

"Over its 59 years, the SOA has trained over 60,000 Latin American soldiers in counterinsurgency techniques, sniper training, commando and psychological warfare, military intelligence and interrogation tactics. These graduates have consistently used their skills to wage a war against their own people. Among those targeted by SOA graduates are educators, union organizers, religious workers, student leaders, and others who work for the rights of the poor. Hundreds of thousands of Latin Americans have been tortured, raped, assassinated, “disappeared,” massacred, and forced into refugee by those trained at the School of Assassins."

I think that it is this organization that has wreaked more havoc in Latin American history than any other outside of the Communist backed or Communist inspired regimes.

And you are bang on the money Juano in saying that things are not always black and white -right or wrong. There are those among us who tend to see things only in that sort of regimen....who are idealistic and say "hey, wait a minute that is not how things are supposed to be" but the more pragmatic in our ranks know you can't go around wearing rose tinted glasses all the time. Times of great social change and mankind's endless series of wars and violence against our fellow man do not allow us the luxury of waiting for dreams to come true. Life just isn't like that.

Politicians like Obama know that so while I did not support or vote for the man largely because I knew all his fine rhetoric was bullshit, I have now come around to liking the guy and will vote for him the next time around. After a year in office, I see he is a pragmatist on dealing in the world of "Realpolitik" and not some idealist like cornpone Jimmy Carter was.

Dirty tricks

are not the exclusive tool of the USA.

For example, while filming news and documentaries in Sarajevo, Mostar and other hot spots during the Serbian - Bosnian conflict, we discovered it was a favorite tactical move by both sides to target news crews from Europe and North America. They would usually pull you aside during an inspection at a checkpoint and give you a good "going over". Very often it was discovered, after the fact that the checkpoint was phony as were the uniforms. What better way to manipulate general opinion to be sympathetic to your cause, than to get all that publicity and sow the world how bad "the other guys" are. I personally was lucky and never got hurt but we did lose a cameraman at one of these phony checkpoints.

These serious games are played everywhere as long there is political hey to be made. Sadly enough, journalists are often targeted because they have the image of being neutral and therefore are supposed to be untouchable. If one of them does get hurt, kidnapped or killed, the political mileage to be made is incredible.

Does the situation in Honduras differ greatly from the Stewart case? Like Juanno see some interesting similarities.

Can the same happen in Nicaragua? Who knows... Likely not, unless there is someone that is willing to be the marionette master without a conscience and the political pay out is extraordinary.

Mike's "funny" post

The US certainly has been involved in manipulation of the situation in Honduras. The US government knew about the coup before it happened. Now, who knew and how much government involvement there was vs. "business involvement" we don't know.

The Honduran press and much international press got used along the way with Honduras and, well, most other "international incidents" from "creating" the Shah of Iran on forward. The good news is that today we can see the details of what happened in Iran, how the Gulf of Tonkin incident was fiction, the attacks on the USS Liberty was staged, ...

What we don't know (yet) is how a lot of these more recent events really got played out. Someday I am sure we will but, right now, some dirty stuff is happening that, as usual, has victims in the third world.

Now, before someone says "well, The Soviets ...", I will be the first to admit that dirty tricks and False Flag operations are not unique to the U.S. government. But, that is no excuse to ignore them. In fact, it is more reason to understand them.

To me, the really sad thing is how quickly these dirty tricks drop from visibility. Of those I listed, the Gulf of Tonkin incident which created a huge war is probably the most significant example but I expect most people in the U.S. don't even know what it was. Someday soon I expect people to "forget" the Iraq has weapons of mass destruction was a big lie as well.

It's nasty in Honduras

The 16 year old pregnant daughter of Karol Cabrera, who gets a last line mention in the article as being wounded (on a live outside broadcast) was shot and killed last December in the same drive by manner. So the families are being targeted as well.